The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has urged the Court of Appeal in Lagos to dismiss an appeal filed by the chairman of Ibeto Energy Development Company, Cletus Ibeto, seeking to nullify the bench warrant issued against him by a Lagos State High Court.
Justice Ismail Ijelu of the Lagos High Court, Ikeja issued the bench warrant against Ibeto on November 3, 2023, after he failed to appear before the court on four different occasions to take his plea over an alleged N4.8 billion fraud despite repeated hearing notices served on him.
The EFCC, on Monday, told the three man panel of appeal led by Justice Muhammed Mustapha that the lower court has the power to order the arrest of the businessman, notwithstanding that he filed a preliminary objection challenging its jurisdiction to trial him.
The other members of the panel are Justice Folashade Ojo and Justice Abdullahi Mahmud Bayero.
Mr Ibeto and his companies, Ibeto Energy Development Company and Odoh Holdings Ltd, were charged with 10 counts of conspiracy, fraud, forgery and fraudulent use of documents.
Through his lawyer, Wole Olanipekun, the defendant filed a preliminary objection challenging the jurisdiction of the court to hear him.
He argued that his preliminary objection raised the issue of constitutional territorial and that it is of such a threshold nature that it demands to be heard and determined before arraignment.
He also contended that his presence in court and his arraignment are not mandatory or preconditions for the hearing of a preliminary objection touching on the court’s jurisdiction, which was already ripe for adjudication.
The appellant, therefore, asked the Court of Appeal to set aside or vacate the warrant of arrest and also strike out the suit before the lower court.
But the counsel for the EFCC, Rotimi Jacobs, argued that it is only when the appellant appears before the court and takes his plea to the charge that issues are joined in a criminal trial and that until this happens, he is technically outside the court’s jurisdiction.
Jacobs also submitted that the appearance of the appellant’s counsel is insufficient because the law empowers the court when satisfied that the defendant is absent without a valid excuse, to issue a bench warrant against him to secure his presence in court.
Court orders arrest of businessman Cletus Ibeto over alleged N4.8bn fraud
Court bars billionaire Cletus Ibeto from laying claim to Port Harcourt property
The EFCC prosecutor further stated that the intention of the lawmaker in enacting section 396 (2) of Administration of Criminal Justice Act, (ACJA) is that any objection regarding the validity of a charge should only be raised after the plea of the defendant has been taken.
“It is not the intention of the lawmaker to give a Defendant who is challenging the validity of an Information or a charge preferred against him the liberty to stay in his house and brief a counsel to appear in court on his behalf without him appearing in court.
“It is clear that the lower court was patient with the Appellant enough, but the Appellant deliberately refused to appear before the court. It is, therefore, unfair for the Appellant to argue that the lower court disregarded its record. The Appellant and the other defendants delayed the proceedings by their deliberate refusal to attend the court’s proceedings,” he said.
Jacobs also told the court that Ibeto had approached the anti-graft agency seeking to enter a plea bargain arrangement and pay back the money he allegedly obtained from the nominal complainant, Daniel Chukwudozie.
Olanipekun however denied knowledge of it.
The court fixed May 7 for the adoption of the appeal by the lawyers.
