Blood on Chidinma Ojukwu’s dress matched Ataga’s – Witness

Usifo Ataga and Chidinma Ojukwu

The 11th prosecution witness Dr Richard Somiari in the alleged murder trial of Chidinma Ojukwu said on Tuesday that the DNA blood sample found on Ms Ojukwu’s dress matched that of the victim, Usifo Ataga.

Somiari, a director and consultant for the Lagos State DNA and Forensic Centre, gave his evidence before a Lagos High Court at Tafawa Balewa Square.

Ojukwu, a student of the University of Lagos, is charged with the murder of Mr Ataga, who was the CEO of Super TV. Other suspects are her sister, Chioma Egbuchu, and one Adedapo Quadri.

At the resumed hearing, the witness was led in evidence by the Lagos State deputy director of public prosecutions, Adenike Oluwafemi.

Somiari said the items received for evidence were a stained red dress, an army green Tshirt, a DNA sample from Ojukwu.

He added that other items received were urine, blood, gastric content and byle which were retained for toxicology report.

He said the goal was to create an evidence triangle to link the suspect to the crime scene and the victim.

Somiari said that the DNA on the red dress matched that of the victim, Ataga.

He, however, said that the DNA did not match that of Ojuwku and the other suspects, Babalola Disu and Oluwatomi Dada.

The witness was cross-examined by the first defendant’s counsel, Onwuka Egwu.

The witness narrated how the result of the toxicology report was forwarded to the office of the attorney-general of Lagos, the commissioner of police and the director of public prosecutions.

He, however, said that not all forensic reports went through such procedure.

When asked if he questioned the report given by Dr Andrea Nuhu, the witness said: “I have already said that I am not a toxicologist. It is a toxicologist that can do such.”

Chidinma Ojukwu admitted spiking Usifo Ataga’s drink — Police officer

Egwu, however, requested for the video of the crime scene to be played and the court granted it.

While the video was playing, he asked the witness whether the samples of the blood on the cotton, the wall, duvet, white polo the victim was wearing, were tested.

The witness answered that the samples were not submitted.

He, however, said that the markers indicated in his report had nothing to do with the video.

He had earlier said that some samples were in storage but not tested.

The second defendant’s counsel Babatunde Busari also cross examined the witness.

Busari asked if any DNA sample was taken from the second defendant, Quadri, the witness said no.

The counsel also asked the witness if he took part in the toxicology analysis which he answered no.

The third defendant’s counsel C. G. Ugochikwu said that she had no examination for the witness.

Justice Yetunde Adesanya adjourned the case until May 30 for continuation of trial.

Ojukwu and Quadri are facing the first to eight counts bordering on conspiracy, murder, and stabbing.

Egbuchu, however, is facing the ninth count of stealing an iPhone 7 belonging to Ataga.